manifesto of the naïve / confessions of the neoconfessionalists / a design for the new romance

…you might want to consider these questions. Otherwise, you could come off as naïve.
–a professor’s response to a student’s assignment in an MFA writing program.

Naïve: 1650s, from Fr. naïve, fem. of naïf, from O.Fr. naif “naive, natural, just born,” from L. nativus “not artificial,” also “native, rustic,” lit. “born, innate, natural” (see native). Related: Naively.[1]

Naïve is a French loanword (adjective, form of naïf) indicating having or showing a lack of experience, understanding or sophistication; in early use, it meant natural or innocent, and did not connote ineptitude.[2]

Naïve adj (1650)  1: marked by unaffected simplicity: artless, ingenuous 2  a: deficient in worldly wisdom or informed judgment; esp: credulous  b: not previously subjected to experimentation or a particular experimental situation; also : not having previously used a particular drug  3: primitive 3d syn see NATURAL (Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary)

We the naïve believe in making mistakes. Without apology. And in the presence of others, even. We believe in answering questions in class incorrectly. Not for the sake of being wrong, but because we believe in process. And because we believe in process, we also believe that learning through making mistakes is one way of moving forward.

We the naïve are prepared to enter the institution with our own approaches to language and method. We aim to exit the institution with our language and methods intact.

That said, we the naïve are open to new approaches. Experiments. Processes. But we refuse to conform or assimilate in order to gain the approval of our peers or mentors.

We the naïve admit that up until this point, we have never heard of Hanna Weiner, Gary Sullivan or John Cayley.

We the naïve admit that up until this point we have never heard of Walter Benjamin, Mikhail Bakhtin, Georg Lukacs. We also admit that we have probably spent more time playing fetch with a dog named Theory than reading theory.

We the naïve admit that up to this point, we have never heard of flarf.

We admit that we do not like flarf. Very much. But we will continue to interact with it, because in everything we like or do not like, there is something to be learned. And where there is something to be learned, there is something to write about. And even if we don’t write about it, this something changes us. And where there is change, there is progress. And what is the act of generating and creating without progress?

We the naïve admit that we have roots in spoken word.
We the naïve believe that spoken word is poetry.

We the naïve are staging a coup to wrestle the word dismal from all conversations about possibilities, futures and outlooks for writers/poets in the United States of America.

We the naïve believe that there is no one way to write. To teach. To learn. And therefore, we dare to believe that our contributions in class (as teacher and student) are valuable.

We the naïve believe in introducing ourselves to other writers because we want to know and work with them, not because they will get us somewhere in the industry. We understand that this may mean the difference between having our work published and not having our work published. But we the naïve don’t give a fuck.

We the naïve choose to refrain from shit-talking.
But we are invested in creating open dialogue around issues and conflicts that may arise amongst our peers and others in the literary/art world.

We the naïve dare to reconnect our bodies with our brains by writing our bodies back into our work. By doing so, we encourage you to re-inhabit your own body.

We dare to reference emotion in our work.
We dare to write above the horizon of the new sentence.
We dare to employ lyricism and narrative.
We dare to use plain language.
We dare to write poems that feel like falling in love
We dare to use the phrase falling in love in a manifesto.

We the Naïve also dare to push ourselves. To go to the reading even if we don’t like the book.  To give responses and feedback on work we don’t know how to begin to approach. To write flarf.

We the naïve believe in exploring resistance before we give ourselves over to it.

We believe in the power of collaboration.
Which means we believe in bridge-building.
Building bridges to connect the medias within which we work.
Bridges spanning the gaps of our histories.
Bridges stretched across the divides of our gendered bodies.

We the naïve believe in creating work that will dismantle the messages we have inherited from the white supremacist capitalist heterosexist patriarchy that teaches us to hate our bodies, our feelings, our work and each other.
We hope to take on this task in the least patronizing way possible.

We dare to believe that our work is important. (Which is not to say that anyone else’s work is less important).

We believe that certain compositions of letters and words we’ve assembled at some point have made others (including ourselves) feel less alone.

If nothing else, we the naïve believe in you.

click here to read a companion manifesto
click here to read another companion manifesto

9 Replies to “manifesto of the naïve / confessions of the neoconfessionalists / a design for the new romance”

  1. yes.

    we the naive know that saying “yes” to something that touches us means to hold it cupped in our palms, close to our lips and our ears and whisper secrets back and forth to it in gratitude.

  2. Hello, I love this manifesto very much and it helped me breathe all the way in today. I am often breathing (always breathing surely), but your manifesto helped get the air big in-big-out. It made me feel relieved and inspired, and in company. Hello I am Taylor I am Ryan’s friend I met you at the cafe, I like your small bangs and your blog (very, very much) and hello. In other news, I just read a Mark Doty poem and the last couple of lines reminded me of the aesthetic of what you have going on on this here website. It’s from a poem entitled “Description.”

    I love the language
    of the day’s ten thousand aspects,

    the creases and flecks
    in the map, these
    brilliant gouaches.

    1. TAYLOR!!!!
      thank you.
      thank you.
      thank you.
      part of the power of this thing is that the more it helps you breathe, the more it helps me breathe right back.
      and you. it’s about time we met. i like yr style and yr overflowing sparkliness and yr rule about peppermint patties for 10 minutes or more of late.

      !

  3. Yes, you’ve certainly got it right. There are so many profound takeaways throughout this manifesto; but your words about process resonated with me most. Thank you for this!

Leave a Reply to frantelope Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s